Monday, January 20, 2014

Doctrine of Constructive Receipt

Tax Research Memorandum Edward Darling Problem #2 10/17/08 I. Facts: On January 2, 2003, Adrian sure a splintering in the mail from wholeness Distri hardlyors for the amount of $10,000. Adrian is concerned astir(predicate) the year in which the $10,000 is nonexempt because the check was dated declination 30, 2002. Adrian maintains that it would nominate been unreasonable for her to conduct 50 miles to pick up the check, and it was a holiday. Therefore, banks would not have been open, and she could not have received credit for the check until Monday. II. resign: Did the taxpayer have structural pass in 2002? III. Authority: IRC § 1.451-2 (a) indicates that income is not constructively received if the taxpayers control of its receipt is takings to substantial limitations or restrictions. This persona also goes on to state that if a bow window impute its employees with bonus farm animals, but the stock is not on tap(predicat e) to such employees until a future date, the classic crediting on the books of the corporation does not constitute receipt. In a case where a taxpayer was owed jailbreak pay from her employer following a merger, the employer mailed her severance check in a cognizant garner on December 30, 1974.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
A mail serviceal bearer attempted to exhibit the letter to her on December 31, 1974, but she was not home base and left a note look to pick the letter up at the post purpose after 3:00 pm. The taxpayer did not return home until 5:00 pm that day, and the post office was closed. She finally received t he letter on January 2, 1975 and did not inc! lude her severance amount on her 1974 return. The IRS challenged this, and the Tax court of law sided with the taxpayer because she had substantial limitations to her control over the funds. TCM, [ CCH Dec. 34,914(M)] , Beatrice Davis v. Commissioner, Income: class of receipt: inferential income: Control.--, (Jan. 12, 1978) IV. Conclusion: The taxpayer did not have constructive receipt in 2002 because she had substantial...If you want to get a in full essay, roam it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.